Before it gets deleted...

[Timmah]

This thread is for all of those posts that seem to get under the skin of the powers-that-be at USuCkHO.com.

You know the threads, the ones that seem to get deleted for the slightest of infractions....Yeah, those...Post'em up so we can all enjoy them.

[Timmah]

This post has already been deleted once....Has been reposted....



Go ahead and delete this again since you didn't like it the first time.

I didn't vote in this poll because I don't think there are really any major rivalries in the NCHA anymore. Sure, the top teams will always battle it out, but that isn't a rivalry. There isn't any hatred between the two teams, just emotion driven by the standings.

Personally, I hate the travel partner system. The NCHA competition lost any and all emotion when they went to the travel partner system. The most memorable weekends of hockey that I can remember are those between Bemidji, Mankato, Superior and Eau Claire where what happened Friday carried over to Saturday.

The way it is now, there is no possible benefit to driving from Stevens Point to De Pere then the next night head down to Lake Forest for another game. Or if you're the Superior Yellowjackets, heading to De Pere for Friday night and then head down to Lake Forest for Saturday.

There's no monetary savings as it's still an over-night, there's no time savings as they're still gone the same amount of time.

Someone, please explain to me how this saves money.

[XYZ]

Why would that get deleted? Seems to me you are just commenting on the travel partner system and that as a fan you liked the old way better.

For fun, here is what started my meltdown the other night, this was the last sentence in a post that largely focused on Lake Forest being overrated last season, as Lerch has said, due to western voters over-voting them. I made the comparison that if western voters did that to LFC, could eastern voters be doing the same to RIT.

"But what do you expect from an operation that hired a guy from Denver to cover the MIAC, NCHA and MCHA?"

As that didn't exactly violate #14 at all, I guess that violated rule #1.

Rule #1: Personal attacks, defamation, libel or flaming will not be tolerated.

Let's see

-Personal Attack: No. I just stated a fact.
-Defamation: Hardly. Implicit in defamation is lying. I did not lie.
Libel: Nope.
Flaming: Nope again.

Whatever.

And quit reading this you bunch of USCHO swine. Your arrogance is highly unfounded. Band-playing geeks and bald guys don't necessarily know anything more about the d3 world than anyone else does. Go do something useful.

So after that one was deleted and I got pissed off, for those of you that never saw it, I had a post that ended:

"F-off. Suspend me you bunch of gutless wonders".


That one, I will admit, clearly violated the rules. Funny thing was that I wasn't even trying to cause a problem until the original one was deleted. All I was doing was discussing the integrity of the poll and before I could conclude making my point it was deleted.

So that's what I said to pick up the warning, for any of you fools who care. It's a good thing I don't try to cause a problem on there as I'm getting in enough trouble without even trying to. Fighting is no fun, it's too bad I keep getting involved in fights when all I want to do is talk about hockey. I guess using logic is off-limits.

I need a beer.

[XYZ]

djw was just told that his post was slanderous.

Yet it's not deleted.

[Timmah]

PointersXRC said:

djw was just told that his post was slanderous.

Yet it's not deleted.

But sladerous toward the committee, not anyone at USCHO.com or RIT.

[XYZ]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh

[Wormser]

"Yep, half-a$$."

My response to the thread, "No player of the week??"

Following a reply from jo glotz, "Also we seem to have lost the Monday weekend wrap up, which I liked."

[Admin]

Here's one from me to Jackasshockeybunny

Re: UWS vs. St. Norbert's
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackethockeybunny
hey POINTERS XRC why dotn you hit the golf course you stupid loser, how was the series against LFC, ah I would have to say painful to say the least so you worry about your little puppiees in Steven's POINT.
BYE BYE BYE

....

That's brilliant.. Is the hamster tired from sprinting on the wheel for that post? Or are you & Chris Nimiec too busy with the hamster and a empty paper towel tube?

[XYZ]

Yeah, I laughed at your reply.

Pretty funny. Although I hate to see a thread go to that, there are times that idiots need to be dealt with.

[Timmah]

I thought she was wet and drippy for Randall Smisko?

[XYZ]

I don't know, but I know that "she" has started about three threads on Niemiec.

[Timmah]

She was the one that started the whole thing regarding Randall and his little injury (which she probably cause with her 300+lb body crashing down on his repeatedly).

[XYZ]

True, but like in her first 5 posts, it was something about UWS (your Smisssssko example being one) and then some question along the line of "DOES anyone know aneething about Chris NIEMIEC....IS HE playing FRIDAY!>?!>? Lomg!!"


and don't go look it up, because I'm exaggerating.

[XYZ]

I also add that in last nights tranwreck of a deleted thread, I think jacketbunny tipped HIS hand a bit too much.

Thats a guy. Someone's just doing it to amuse themselves, and that I can respect.

If it's a real person, I feel for their soul.

[XYZ]

Oh man, you think this one would fly:

Quote jackethockeybunny's nonsense, and post this link:

wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetails.do;jsessionid=C8768FA41788632336A738D2E7AE6963.render4?countyNo=16&caseNo=2003FO000268&cacheId=10BCF3DD18E8597BFC399B12C7B3A409&recordCount=1&offset=0

Caption: Did you have anything to do with this??
---

I'd never actually post it there, but god the setup is just asking for it.